Most tools hand you a one-line "buy" and hope you don't ask why. This agent runs the same multi-phase workflow a sell-side analyst uses — quality filters, discounted cash-flow valuation, governance forensics, a mandatory bear case — and shows its work on every single parameter.
See how it grades a stockA broker note says "buy" and moves on. A finfluencer pumps the bull case and buries the risks. A stock screener throws forty raw numbers at you and leaves you to interpret them alone. None of it tells you whether the returns are real or borrowed, whether the price is stretched, or when to walk away.
Every check a sell-side analyst runs — return on capital, growth quality, cash conversion, solvency, promoter governance, discounted cash-flow valuation — scored PASS, FAIL, or FLAG in plain English. A mandatory bear case. A disclosed valuation. A specific entry price. You see exactly why the verdict is what it is.
It refuses to fake conviction. If the balance sheet is weak or the price is stretched, the verdict says AVOID — and shows you exactly which checks failed. No pumping, no conflicts of interest, no house view to sell you.
Every parameter comes back with a status you can read at a glance — and the exact number behind it. Here's what a finished verdict looks like.
| Parameter | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Return on capital (3-yr avg) | 24% | PASS |
| Revenue growth (3-yr CAGR) | 18% | PASS |
| Free cash-flow conversion | 52% | FLAG |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.3 | PASS |
| Promoter pledging | 0% | PASS |
| Valuation vs. fair value (PEG) | 1.3 | FLAG |
| Bear-case downside | -32% | WITHIN TOLERANCE |
The same disciplined sequence a research desk follows — no step skipped, no red flag glossed over.
Pulls filings, transcripts, and shareholding. Runs disqualifying checks — pledging, auditor flags, chronic cash burn — before anything else.
Model, moat, cyclicality, and concentration risk — so the numbers are read in the right frame, not in a vacuum.
Capital efficiency, the 15% growth rule, cash-flow quality, solvency, and governance — each one graded PASS, FAIL, or FLAG.
Peer comparison, relative multiples, and a dual discounted cash-flow model — bull and conservative — with every input disclosed.
Analyst consensus, institutional buying and selling, earnings-reaction history, and a 90-day event calendar flagged for near-term risk.
A quality score drives the rating matrix to STRONG BUY, BUY, WATCH, or AVOID — plus an entry price and a staggered buy plan.
Institutional discipline, tuned to a long-term investor's profile — a 5-year horizon and a 15% return target.
Every quality, governance, and valuation parameter an institutional desk would run — each one graded and sourced, never hand-waved.
A mandatory bear case, a downside floor, and fundamental exit triggers. Not a pitch — a balanced verdict you can act on with your eyes open.
A specific entry price with a 20% margin of safety, plus a staggered buy plan tuned to a long-term hold. The decision comes with a plan attached.
Name any listed company — India first, US supported — and I'll run the full framework end to end and hand you the graded verdict.